You are here: Home » Blog » General Strategy » Leave Them in the Dust

Leave Them in the Dust

by Ed on 26th November 2007

I just got back from Paul Gorman’s “Leave Them in the Dust” seminar.

As usual it was an awesome weekend spent in the company of an amazing group of people. And the range of strategy, detailed tactics and depth of content Paul covered was quite staggering.

As someone who has been on the ‘Paul Gorman Roadshow’ for more than 4 years now (starting with me attending his £35,000 week-long “Business Millionaire” seminar in Brighton in December 2003), I’m especially sad there won’t be any more marketing seminars.

Paul changed my life. And I do mean that quite literally.

If you’ve not heard about Paul, you can still buy his books and exceptional home-study programmes from www.PaulGorman.com. All strongly recommended.

As mentioned last week, at Paul’s request I also spoke at the event. I generally avoid public speaking for a number of reasons, so on the basis “repetition is the mother of all skill” my public speaking style isn’t particularly refined.

However, based on feedback I’m relieved to say it seems my 2 hour talk on Internet Marketing was well received. (Nobody fell asleep or left the room… always a good sign.)

The first point I raised in my talk was to not listen to anyone who says the first promotional tactic to do after launching a new web site is to “pay for search engine optimisation to get it listed on Google”.

I’ve been saying this for years — there are so many less risky and much faster ways of getting gargantuan streams of traffic (qualified prospects) onto web sites without risking lots of money on SEO (search engine optimisation).

SEO should come later once the site’s proven it can convert visitors into customers, definitely not before.

Then I got stuck into landing pages… spent the rest of the 2 hours covering sales-lead generation and customer acquisition, and how to split-path and multi-variate test. I think it all went OK based on post-talk feedback.

And after my talk, the first three business owners who I spoke with all said the same thing. They had each invested many thousands of pounds — and lots of faith — in outsourced search engine optimisation services… and had NO return on investment.

Literally, not one of them had a single extra sale or enquiry, and their sites are nowhere to be found on Google. Shocking.

In fact one business had even been advised by their web company to NOT split-test their Google Adwords, which must qualify as “The World’s Worst Internet Marketing Advice” I’ve ever heard.

Split-testing Google Adwords — which are the small ‘Sponsored’ adverts you see at the top and right side of Google’s search results) is not only quick and easy but is also one of the fastest ways of lowering your bid price.

These business owners had been given dreadful, dreadful advice. (Liz ∓ Lucy: Get a new agency to handle your Google Adwords as a matter of urgency… the ones you have will be costing you a fortune.)

I also discovered very few business owners in the room had even heard about, let alone use, landing pages, split-path or multi-variate tested landing pages, or even able to track their web statistics.

It’s just not common knowledge, which is a shame because all of those methodologies have been available for years now, and the software required is incredibly inexpensive these days (or even free, like Google Analytics for example.)

So… it appears I’m still on track.

I was worried it was getting dated, but it’s obvious the advice in my now 2 year old book is still as fresh and valid today as it was when I wrote it back in 2005. There is as much need for business owners to get this advice and apply the tactics to their web sites today as there was back then.

If you were at the event, it was nice meeting you and I hope we get the opportunity to meet again someday.

But whether or not you were at the event, I look forward to using my blog to explain what I didn’t have time to cover in my 2 hour slot, starting tomorrow with split-testing Google Adwords. (Liz & Lucy especially… get ready to grab a pen and take notes! :-) .

-Ed.

  • http://www.copywriting4b2b.com Carol Bentley

    Hi Ed,

    great session at the weekend and your ‘unrefined presentation style’ is like a breath of fresh air!

    All your tips during your talk (was it really 2 hours? Seemed more like 5 minutes) and when chatting certainly made sense; especially as I’ve had occasion to use some of your tips with great results.

    I’m looking forward to implementing the other techniques you talked about that I haven’t yet had a chance to try.

    Thank you for your generosity in sharing without a ‘sales pitch’!

    I look forward to your future posts. :)

  • http://www.johnmurraymedia.com Jim Fairbairn

    Ed
    Paul Gorman too totally changed my thinking around business, life and how to influence people. Like yourself I have followed him since one of his early Protege programmes.

    In fact I have only ever met 3 people in my life who have 100% belief (or total congruence as NLP calls it) – they are Paul, David Shephard (NLP trainer) and the Chairman of the Group of companies I work for. In fact I remember asking my Chairman, what is the one thing that has made the difference to his success (he is worth about £400M!) and without thinking he said belief. He justs acts as if!

    Unfortunately I could not be at Paul’s last course as I had to travel at short notice – I have only met Paul on a sales training course in Edinburgh which was absolutely great, so hopefully the home study course will be out soon.

    Regards
    Jim

  • http://www.internet-marketing-data.com/ Internet Marketing Blog

    Wow, I can’t believe some of the ‘advice’ that you heard from these people. Not split testing on an Adwords campaign!?? Are you serious! One thing though, I personally suggest implementing a website with SEO in mind from the get go. Don’t try and catch up after the fact. Its easier to start on the right track then attempting to cover lost ground.

  • http://www.propayperclickmanagement.com ppc management

    Interesting post. Question though, if you say to not start by paying for advertising as a way to get in good with Google, what do you suggest. I’ve always been under the impression that that IS the way to start (we definintely do do split testing thought). Anyway, I’d be interested to hear more.

    Thanks and all the best.

  • http://www.cianlp.com/ NLP Trainer in London

    Content is always king. Compelling your website visitors to perform desirable (to you) actions is the ultimate goal, and quality content will encourage visitors into staying at your site and doing things there. SEO leads them to your site, but it’s no good without “activating” them into these actions once they arrive. I don’t see SEO as something that should be put on hold though. It’s a slow and steady campaign from the day the site launches. Quality content without visitors is a waste – and I don’t believe quality content naturally brings links to your site – link-baiting / building is very much a pro-active activity!

  • http://www.promoitemscorpgifts.com/ Promotional Items Corporate Gifts SRednarb

    I have consulted with a so-called SEO expert, and he told me otherwise that I start with SEO first. Actually my site is not 100% complete yet and yet he recommends me to start doing SEO and his reasoning, as how I understand it is, he said “for the SEO to age.” As if the older it is the better. I am having some doubts and needed a second opinion. Thanks for this blog post, maybe I will test out the site first and make sure i can really make money out of it before I do SEO.

  • http://www.diamonds.priorityplant.com/ Diamond Blades

    @Previous commenter (above this one), I think the SEO guy was talking about links. Search engines trust older links because they’ve been around and not been removed. A new link needs to gain the trust from search engines, so that’s where “age” comes into it.

  • http://www.edrivis.com Ed

    Thanks for all your ‘keyword stuffed’ comments. ;-)

    It never ceases to amaze me how much time and money businesses spend trying to get their sites to the top of the search engines when they havn’t even got a strong compelling headline at the top of their homepage, or any incentivised email subscription box on their web sites.

    I can see at least one of the websites above could run an industry targetted print advert to send traffic to a landing page and get thousands of enquiries leading to sales within 30 days. Exactly like I blogged about a while ago. And yet they spend all day trying to game Google?

    The first comment was bang on — set your site up correctly first so it has a fighting chance of SEO if you really care about that. I don’t, because most of my prospects aren’t even aware they can use the web a lot more effectively, and therefore aren’t trawling Google.

Previous post:

Next post: